A single data repository, integrated data applications, one view of information, data governance, operational efficiency, automation, and an omnichannel customer experience: These all sound related to both product information management (PIM) and master data management (MDM) to you? And thus useful for your business? Then you’re not alone! For a lot of decision-makers, a cloud of confusion often hangs over what’s the difference between the two.
The truth is: There are wide variations between PIM and MDM regarding the purposes they serve and their advantages to fit the needs and aspirations of businesses. Here’s a 10-point attempt at untangling the puzzle by addressing the timeless PIM vs. MDM question.
PIM, as the name suggests, is a business application to manage product information. Its job is to gather information from every possible data source that stores product information. It serves to consolidate, enrich, and turn this product information into accurate, use-worthy, consistent, and complete datasets. A PIM is mainly required for the marketing and selling of products on enterprise sales channels. Typically, it is needed by manufacturers, retailers, CPG businesses, and distributors. PIM also facilitates collaboration across functions, while streamlining critical workflows.
Needless to say, product information can be as wide-ranging as:
To manage this product information, a PIM is needed, and not a master data management (MDM) platform. MDM covers a much broader range of deployment areas. It centralizes all enterprise data of customers, locations, suppliers, financials, and even product information.
Main Motive to use PIM and not MDM: catching up with the extraordinary growth in omnichannel selling and speeding up the time-to-market. A PIM has the ability to scale and syndicate product information quickly and simultaneously to various customer touchpoints. PIM can carry out product customization on a global level, optimize efficiency while keeping a laser-sharp focus on improving the customer experience.
To put it plainly, MDM is for company-wide data what PIM is for product data. But MDM’s ambit is much broader than that. It is an IT-led initiative that focuses on centralizing all enterprise data entities in a “golden record” to make it consistently available across the enterprise. Master data refers to the essential business information associated with the analytical and transactional operations within an enterprise. Master data points to the business-oriented properties of data objects used in applications across the enterprise alongside their connected attributes, metadata, roles, associations, taxonomies, and descriptions.
MDM involves technologies, applications, business clients, partners, and stakeholders. It cleans up, centralizes, and syncs corporate master data to execute processes, workflows, and operations. An essential piece of MDM is master data governance, which is steered by the enterprise Data Governance Council. And it charts out data definitions, access rights, controls, implementation policies, and procedures.
Main Motive to use MDM and not PIM: A PIM cannot do what MDM can. Master data management system aims to improve enterprise business intelligence, speed up decision making, boost relations with customers, enhance agility and outcomes of business processes, build operational efficiencies, and provide smarter data governance. All this is done for the larger purpose of enterprise growth, which goes way beyond the scope of PIM.
Whenever product data is managed inside of an MDM system, as all other essential business data, it is referred to as Product MDM. The system serves the primary purpose of developing associations among customers, employees, products, vendors, locations, and households in order to fulfill the analytical and operational needs of the business. The goal then is to get real-time knowledge by associating product data to several other data domains in many hierarchies, apart from product-to-product associations.
In other words, the scope of Product MDM is broader than supporting a few departments such as sales and marketing. Its need often arises from several different domains from inside the enterprise. It supports the operational, inventory forecasting, and supply chain side of the business. The request for a product MDM is mostly raised by the IT when product data discrepancies are flagged by various departments.
How PIM is different from a Product MDM: Ideally, an enterprise PIM system is built upon a data management platform for collaboration on product content. It has predefined features like data modeling, workflow management, data semantics, and data integration & delivery, along with a user-friendly UI. Its benefits include consolidating data from silos, digitalization, automation, omnichannel enablement. And it is aimed at decreasing time-to-market, building engaging product experiences, and revenue growth.
Can PIM and Product MDM go hand in hand?
Organizations can go for both systems if their use case allows for it. When combined, they can unlock an entire ecosystem. PIM can consolidate product data for distribution to several customer touchpoints, while product master data can be used to develop relationships among customers, products, and vendors. The latter can also be sent to business apps. Product MDM will bring along advantages like better reporting, analytics, and forecasting for supply chain efficiency.
It must always be kept in mind that fulfilling the need for a PIM with a Product MDM may not be the right thing to do, as some product data will always remain outside of the Product MDM. This means, it would have to be fetched from other systems every time. Hence, it wouldn’t sufficiently meet the requirements of the sales and marketing departments, where speed, accuracy, and control over product data is non-negotiable.
The fundamental difference between a PIM solution and an MDM solution lies in the needs that they meet.
A PIM solution is typically needed to deal with product data accuracy issues. To live up to the requirements of an explosion of customer touchpoints, enterprises strive for a faster time-to-market, omnichannel enablement, quick new product introductions, faster growth, and a higher ROI. PIM is needed when traditional product data management systems can’t cope with the rising number of product SKUs. And when data collection and collaboration with vendors and suppliers face setbacks due to dependence on manual means of managing data.
An MDM solution caters to the operational and analytical needs and requirements of an enterprise. Operational needs have to do with the integration of technologies that improve enterprise-wide efficiency, streamline supply chain operations, and boost processes. Analytical needs refer to better business intelligence, forecasting, analysis, and insights. Of course, both analytical and operational requirements aim towards decreasing the time-to-market, reduce costs, achieve a higher ROI, and improve the customer experience.
It entirely depends on your use case; you will need to analyze it thoroughly. Some examples:
Although sometimes used interchangeably with PIM, Product Data Management (PDM) fulfills a very distinct need for enterprises. It is used to manage computer-aided design (CAD) data, technical specifications, models, manufacturing instructions, drawings, engineering documentation, and information on parts in one specific location. In other words, it is mostly used by engineering teams to revise, track, collaborate, manage orders, or generate bills of materials. A PDM is considered a subcategory of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM).
A Digital Asset Management (DAM) platform centralizes all sorts of product media assets, including images, videos, graphics, music, videos, animations, podcasts, and other media content. It falls under the ambit of PIM.
Also read-
*For more information, read about MDM implementation styles in detail.
Proprietary | Community Open-source |
Enterprise Open-source (Open-core) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vendor lock-in | The customizability of the software is totally restricted. New features or modifications according to a businesses’ specific needs are not feasible. And if they are, they come with a high cost. | Open-source offers you unlimited access to the source code. In other words, you get total flexibility to change it and use it to your advantage. | Some portion of the product is free; however, the add-ons or features in the enterprise version, come with a commercial license fee. | |
Source code—Who can access and who can build it? | Access, as well as code building rights are strictly limited to the enterprise only. | A purely open source model offers a no-holds-barred access to codes and algorithms, and invites the developers’ community to add their contributions. |
The community edition version source code is free and modifiable. However, the vendor holds exclusive access to enterprise edition code, which is built and modified only by the enterprise’s employees. | |
Business Model | Proprietary software is the opposite of open-source software. It sells the ownership or access to the software for a fixed cost. It issues a commercial license to use the technology. Nothing about the software is free. | Purely open-source models charge businesses only for technical support/services, by becoming technology partners, or by selling it as a cloud-based service. | As a business model, open core or Commercial Open Source Software (COSS) companies typically offer community and enterprise editions. A community edition offers a “core” or limited features of the software, while the “commercial” version provides add-on features and other purchasable software elements. |
|
Innovation | The scope for innovation in the source code or platform is very limited. Integrations with newer technologies are possible, but only with the intervention and permission of the proprietary vendor. | Since the source code is freely accessible, it opens up the floodgates for innovation. Open-source software can be easily leveraged to integrate with new and upcoming technologies especially related to Artificial Intelligence, IoT, and Machine Learning. | Full flexibility to innovate exists in the community editions. Enterprise editions come attached with conditions; where integrations depend largely on the use case and the MOU signed with the open-core technology provider. | |
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | Every proprietary software comes with a license fee for PIM/MDM deployment, which mostly encompasses implementation, customization, and system maintenance. This increases the overall cost. | Compared to proprietary software, open-source PIM/MDM software is free. The development efforts can be carried out in-house or via your chosen IT vendor, slashing the overall cost considerably. Businesses have complete control over the intellectual property of the solution they create. | In an open-core environment, TCO remains less only for as long as a community edition is used. Once the enterprise edition of the software is used, a license fee comes in. Also, this fee does not include the implementation and customization of the solution. | |
Deployment | After purchasing the license, a proprietary software, can be deployed on-premise or on a private/public/community or hybrid cloud (depending on the agreement with the vendor) | An open-source software can be deployed on premise in the physical data centers or in the cloud, by paying to the cloud hosting service provider. | Open Core deployment: Open-core software can be deployed on premise or on cloud. In case of cloud deployments, it is the software vendor who takes care of license compatibility, inbuilt manageability and security features that businesses require. In return for it, vendors charge a monthly/annual fee for hosting and supporting it. In some cases, businesses also opt to handle the maintenance on the cloud, on their own. | SaaS: Another popular software deployment model is SaaS. A SaaS model is based on a cloud, therefore the deployment and installation takes no effort and resources of businesses. Everything in this model, such as scalability, upgrades and updates are the vendor’s responsibility. It saves businesses the hardware/software, maintenance as well as integration costs. It is also very secure and stable, as cloud infrastructure is generally provided by big reliable companies such as AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, etc. |
Proprietary | Community Open-source |
Enterprise Open-source (Open-core) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vendor lock-in | The customizability of the software is totally restricted. New features or modifications according to a businesses’ specific needs are not feasible. And if they are, they come with a high cost. | Open-source offers you unlimited access to the source code. In other words, you get total flexibility to change it and use it to your advantage. | Some portion of the product is free; however, the add-ons or features in the enterprise version, come with a commercial license fee. | |
Source code—Who can access and who can build it? | Access, as well as code building rights are strictly limited to the enterprise only. | A purely open source model offers a no-holds-barred access to codes and algorithms, and invites the developers’ community to add their contributions. |
The community edition version source code is free and modifiable. However, the vendor holds exclusive access to enterprise edition code, which is built and modified only by the enterprise’s employees. | |
Business Model | Proprietary software is the opposite of open-source software. It sells the ownership or access to the software for a fixed cost. It issues a commercial license to use the technology. Nothing about the software is free. | Purely open-source models charge businesses only for technical support/services, by becoming technology partners, or by selling it as a cloud-based service. | As a business model, open core or Commercial Open Source Software (COSS) companies typically offer community and enterprise editions. A community edition offers a “core” or limited features of the software, while the “commercial” version provides add-on features and other purchasable software elements. |
|
Innovation | The scope for innovation in the source code or platform is very limited. Integrations with newer technologies are possible, but only with the intervention and permission of the proprietary vendor. | Since the source code is freely accessible, it opens up the floodgates for innovation. Open-source software can be easily leveraged to integrate with new and upcoming technologies especially related to Artificial Intelligence, IoT, and Machine Learning. | Full flexibility to innovate exists in the community editions. Enterprise editions come attached with conditions; where integrations depend largely on the use case and the MOU signed with the open-core technology provider. | |
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | Every proprietary software comes with a license fee for PIM/MDM deployment, which mostly encompasses implementation, customization, and system maintenance. This increases the overall cost. | Compared to proprietary software, open-source PIM/MDM software is free. The development efforts can be carried out in-house or via your chosen IT vendor, slashing the overall cost considerably. Businesses have complete control over the intellectual property of the solution they create. | In an open-core environment, TCO remains less only for as long as a community edition is used. Once the enterprise edition of the software is used, a license fee comes in. Also, this fee does not include the implementation and customization of the solution. | |
Deployment | After purchasing the license, a proprietary software, can be deployed on-premise or on a private/public/community or hybrid cloud (depending on the agreement with the vendor) | An open-source software can be deployed on premise in the physical data centers or in the cloud, by paying to the cloud hosting service provider. | Open Core deployment: Open-core software can be deployed on premise or on cloud. In case of cloud deployments, it is the software vendor who takes care of license compatibility, inbuilt manageability and security features that businesses require. In return for it, vendors charge a monthly/annual fee for hosting and supporting it. In some cases, businesses also opt to handle the maintenance on the cloud, on their own. | SaaS: Another popular software deployment model is SaaS. A SaaS model is based on a cloud, therefore the deployment and installation takes no effort and resources of businesses. Everything in this model, such as scalability, upgrades and updates are the vendor’s responsibility. It saves businesses the hardware/software, maintenance as well as integration costs. It is also very secure and stable, as cloud infrastructure is generally provided by big reliable companies such as AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, etc. |
Pimcore comes with features such as Data Modeling, Data Quality, Data Management, Data Integration, and Workflow Management. No matter what your PIM/MDM needs are, Pimcore can consolidate and integrate any size, any type, and any format of digital data for organizations of any size or belonging to any industry.
Pimcore has helped scores of clients by: